Innovya - The only Traceless Biometrics Authenticator
Biometric collection is a tail chasing - The bigger the privacy violation the more progress it makes away from its real goals.
Robert A. Mocny, Director, US-VISIT Program, Department of Homeland Security: “AS THE DATABASE GROWS IN SIZE WE NEED MORE INFORMATION” - a paradox indeed... Biometric collection is a tail chasing!!
The Business of Fake Passports
Biometric and Chips implanted on ID cards are Cloneable and Extremely Dangerous
One of the most crucial questions in any transaction is the identity of the entity (person) with whom the transaction is being conducted. Historically, personal relationships, face-to-face contract signings, notaries, and third party counsel are used to help establish trust in this most important aspect of conducting our business. As the reliance on paper shifts to electronic transactions and documents, so must the reliance on traditional trust factors shift to electronic security measures to authenticate before engaging in the exchange of information, goods, and services. Similarly, the need for confidentiality and confidence in the integrity of exchanged information is critical. Many other applications in everyday life also require user authentication, such as banking, e-commerce, and physical access control to computer resources, and could benefit from enhanced security. Fortunately, automated biometrics can provide a much more accurate and reliable user authentication method. However, privacy advocates in a justifiable manner argue that traceable biometrics will lead to erosion of personal privacy in both the real world and cyber-space. There are no legal restrictions on biometrically identifying information, or biometric authentication systems. However: there are severe restrictions on collecting, creating, maintaining, using, or disseminating records of identifiable personal data. It means, Biometrics authentication must be traceless. Innovya Research & Development has developed a new Traceless Biometrics Solution protected by worldwide patents that enabling secure transactions without storage of unique biometric information and still can clearly authenticates user's identity.
Innovya’s BIdToken is not stored on any database, such as a bank, government, or any other systems. Instead, the user securely provides the BIdToken and thus maintains control over it. For example, a secured BIdToken can replace the PIN associated with an ATM card. Only the combination of physically possessing the ATM and Innovya’s Biometric Identifier (BIdToken), permits the individual to make a transaction at the ATM machine. In this new situation when a PIN and/or PIN and card are shared with another individual or is stolen, the identity of the individual using the card can be determined, allowing only the true owner to use the card. The method for determining the BIdToken is kept secure and therefore it is not possible to determine the non-unique BIdToken or its generation from the fingerprint or other unique biometric identifier by an unauthorized party (reverse engineering). However, a BIdToken can be replaced by another one and still be associated with the real biometrics owner. Innovya's solution neutralizes the obligation requirements for trust by third parties.
The Case against Biometrics Collections:
The current Biometric authentication methods present a serious threat in a manner that many people regard it as demeaning. The Biometric scheme represents the kind of closed-minded society that the Soviet Union created, and which the free world decried.
According the basic human dignity law: “There shall be no violation of the life, body or dignity of any person as such”: Human Dignity transcends any social order as the basis for rights and is neither granted by society nor can it be legitimately violated by society.
As free individuals, living in a free country, we have the right to control our own body identifiers and our own physical characteristics. "We are not animals, we are human beings - our body and its lineaments are NOT a blob of tissue” … Biometric is referring to ‘Vital body organs measurement, derived from the Greek words Bio (life) and Metric (to measure). From a democratic and legal point of view, an individual has the right to manage his own bodily identifiers (body, dignity, markers, privacy) or retained intrinsic body cutoffs, as the conceptual basis for human rights.
Biometrics should enhance rather than conflict with individual privacy and dignity. As stated by the philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804): “Human beings should never be treated as merely means to an end” - Namely, ‘Human beings are the purpose, they must not be sacrificed to fulfill other purposes’.
Please remove any remaining civil liberties and place them in the tray, Sir
Can you clone RFID and Smart-Card? YES You Can ....
